Merck V. Integra: (Section) 271(E) (1) and the Common Law Research Exemption. Merck V. Integra: (Section) 271(E) (1) and the Common Law Research Exemption.

Merck V. Integra: (Section) 271(E) (1) and the Common Law Research Exemption‪.‬

The Journal of Corporation Law 2007, Summer, 32, 4

    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

I. INTRODUCTION Protection from patent infringement liability for certain research-related activities has been a component of U.S. patent law from the early days of the patent system. These exemptions from infringement liability represent a limitation on patent exclusivity as well as an important mechanism for ensuring that patent exclusivity does not unduly hinder technological advancement. For these reasons, when the Supreme Court speaks regarding the scope of a research exemption, a close look at the scope of the exemption is warranted. In Merck v. Integra, (1) the Supreme Court issued an opinion explicitly interpreting a statutory research exemption. However, this opinion also provides guidance for how courts in the future should view the interaction between this statutory research exemption and the common law research exemption.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2007
June 22
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
39
Pages
PUBLISHER
University of Iowa Journal of Corporation Law
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
303.1
KB

More Books by The Journal of Corporation Law

The Inconvenient Truth About Corporate Governance: Some Thoughts on Vice-Chancellor Strine's Essay (Response to Article by Leo E. Strine Jr. In This Issue, P. 1) The Inconvenient Truth About Corporate Governance: Some Thoughts on Vice-Chancellor Strine's Essay (Response to Article by Leo E. Strine Jr. In This Issue, P. 1)
2007
No Seat at the Table: How Corporate Governance and Law Keep Women out of the Boardroom (Book Review) No Seat at the Table: How Corporate Governance and Law Keep Women out of the Boardroom (Book Review)
2008
Caremark and Enterprise Risk Management. Caremark and Enterprise Risk Management.
2009
The Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in Corporate Governance: A Comment on Strine. (Article by Leo E. Strine Jr. In This Issue, P. 1) The Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in Corporate Governance: A Comment on Strine. (Article by Leo E. Strine Jr. In This Issue, P. 1)
2007
Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment After the Dubai Ports Controversy: Has the U.S. Government Finally Figured out How to Balance Foreign Threats to National Security Without Alienating Foreign Companies? Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment After the Dubai Ports Controversy: Has the U.S. Government Finally Figured out How to Balance Foreign Threats to National Security Without Alienating Foreign Companies?
2008
Commentary on "Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance" by Leo E. Strine, Jr (Response to Article in This Issue, P. 1) Commentary on "Toward Common Sense and Common Ground? Reflections on the Shared Interests of Managers and Labor in a More Rational System of Corporate Governance" by Leo E. Strine, Jr (Response to Article in This Issue, P. 1)
2007