Mind and Cosmos Mind and Cosmos

Mind and Cosmos

Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False

    • 5.0 • 3 Ratings
    • $26.99

Publisher Description

The modern materialist approach to life has conspicuously failed to explain such central mind-related features of our world as consciousness, intentionality, meaning, and value. This failure to account for something so integral to nature as mind, argues philosopher Thomas Nagel, is a major problem, threatening to unravel the entire naturalistic world picture, extending to biology, evolutionary theory, and cosmology.

Since minds are features of biological systems that have developed through evolution, the standard materialist version of evolutionary biology is fundamentally incomplete. And the cosmological history that led to the origin of life and the coming into existence of the conditions for evolution cannot be a merely materialist history, either. An adequate conception of nature would have to explain the appearance in the universe of materially irreducible conscious minds, as such.

Nagel's skepticism is not based on religious belief or on a belief in any definite alternative. In Mind and Cosmos, he does suggest that if the materialist account is wrong, then principles of a different kind may also be at work in the history of nature, principles of the growth of order that are in their logical form teleological rather than mechanistic.

In spite of the great achievements of the physical sciences, reductive materialism is a world view ripe for displacement. Nagel shows that to recognize its limits is the first step in looking for alternatives, or at least in being open to their possibility.

GENRE
Non-Fiction
RELEASED
2012
October 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
144
Pages
PUBLISHER
Oxford University Press
SELLER
The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford trading as Oxford University Press
SIZE
6.2
MB

Customer Reviews

FormicFoe ,

Simple, quick, and interesting

I read this on an indirect recommendation from a friend. I was pleasantly surprised at its written pace, informal style, and clear exposition of ideas. I highly recommend this as a good read for anyone interested in the intersection of science, philosophy and theology. FWIW, I generally agree with the author’s statements and conclusions but I felt the main weakness of the text was in glossing over important mathematical concepts that could have made his argument stronger.

Galileo's Error Galileo's Error
2019
The Critique of Pure Reason The Critique of Pure Reason
2015
THE THREE CRITIQUES: The Critique of Pure Reason, The Critique of Practical Reason & The Critique of Judgment THE THREE CRITIQUES: The Critique of Pure Reason, The Critique of Practical Reason & The Critique of Judgment
2015
The Full Extent The Full Extent
2022
All Things Are Full of Gods All Things Are Full of Gods
2024
Essays Towards a Theory of Knowledge Essays Towards a Theory of Knowledge
2015
What Does It All Mean? What Does It All Mean?
1987
The View From Nowhere The View From Nowhere
1986
GeomInt–Mechanical Integrity of Host Rocks GeomInt–Mechanical Integrity of Host Rocks
2021
The Last Word The Last Word
2001
Thomas Nagel -Qu’est-ce que tout cela veut dire ? - Résumé & Fiche de lecture Thomas Nagel -Qu’est-ce que tout cela veut dire ? - Résumé & Fiche de lecture
2025
Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical (THMC) Processes in Bentonite Barrier Systems Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical (THMC) Processes in Bentonite Barrier Systems
2024
The Conscious Mind The Conscious Mind
1996
Return of the God Hypothesis Return of the God Hypothesis
2021
When We Cease to Understand the World When We Cease to Understand the World
2021
Trust (Pulitzer Prize Winner) Trust (Pulitzer Prize Winner)
2022
The Wager The Wager
2023