Neal v. Smc Corp. Neal v. Smc Corp.

Neal v. Smc Corp‪.‬

99 S.W.3D 813, 2003.TX.0001287

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Fred Neal, Jr. and Doris Neal (the Neals) appeal the trial courts refusal to grant a joint and several judgment against Beaver Motor Coaches, Inc. (Beaver), the manufacturer, along with the seller, R & K Camping Center, Inc. d/b/a/ R.V. World of Texas (R&K), on their claim for revocation of acceptance under section 2.608 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) and denial of $20,000 of appellate attorneys fees in conformity with the jurys verdict. SMC Corporation and Beaver bring a cross-point complaining that the trial court did not properly submit the question on revocation to the jury. Because we conclude that Beaver is not liable for the revocation of acceptance claim and that the Neals are not entitled to appellate attorneys fees, we resolve the Neals two issues against them and affirm the trial courts judgment. We need not address the cross- point.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
February 20
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
53.5
KB

More Books by In the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas

Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Meb Engineering Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Meb Engineering
2004
Taylor v. State Taylor v. State
2003
Urena v. Western Investments Urena v. Western Investments
2003
Aleman v. Ben E. Keith Co. Aleman v. Ben E. Keith Co.
2007
Garza v. Hibernia National Bank Garza v. Hibernia National Bank
2007
Nicholson v. Fifth Third Bank Nicholson v. Fifth Third Bank
2007