Note on Electronic Government Note on Electronic Government

Note on Electronic Government

9B02A005

    • $3.99
    • $3.99

Publisher Description

Using the Internet for locating information and completing business transactions has become a regular practice for many people. As a result, citizens are demanding greater online access to government information, including the ability to complete government-related transactions through Web sites. Electronic government (egov) is no longer an optional addition to traditional forms of providing government service; it is a necessity. In order to meet users expectations (raised by competitive levels of service and security offered by private sector Web sites), government leaders face many challenges in creating an effective egov. This note examines the current state and the future prospects of egov, with particular emphasis on North America.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2002
March 11
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
24
Pages
PUBLISHER
Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation
SELLER
Ivey Business School Foundation
SIZE
1.1
MB
e-Government in Singapore e-Government in Singapore
2005
e-Business Fundamentals e-Business Fundamentals
2003
Information and Communications for Development 2018 Information and Communications for Development 2018
2018
The Business of Data The Business of Data
2020
Applying E-Commerce in Business Applying E-Commerce in Business
2003
Institutional Approach to E-Commerce: An Integrated Framework for Pakistan (Note) Institutional Approach to E-Commerce: An Integrated Framework for Pakistan (Note)
2002
Maple Leaf Simply Fresh (A) Maple Leaf Simply Fresh (A)
2011
Note on Retail Customer Analysis Note on Retail Customer Analysis
2005
Incredible Universe Incredible Universe
1999
Note on Multi-channel Retailing Note on Multi-channel Retailing
2002
Note on Database Marketing Note on Database Marketing
2003
Canadian Tire Corporation, Bicycle Category: The Schwinn Assortment Decision Canadian Tire Corporation, Bicycle Category: The Schwinn Assortment Decision
2005