People v. Yeoman People v. Yeoman

People v. Yeoman

72 P.3d 1166, 31 Cal.4th 93, 2 Cal.Rptr.3d 186, 3 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6313, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7888, CA.0006740(2003)

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

A jury found defendant Ralph Michael Yeoman guilty of the first degree murder of Doris Horrell and found true the special circumstance that the murder occurred during the commission of a robbery. (Pen. Code, §§ 187, 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(A).) 1 The jury also found defendant guilty of robbery and false imprisonment (§§ 211, 236) and found true the allegation that, in each of these crimes, defendant personally used a firearm (§ 12022.5). The jury found not true the additional special circumstance that the murder occurred during the commission of a kidnapping. (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(B).) The jury imposed the sentence of death. The trial court stayed the convictions for robbery and false imprisonment under section 654, struck the enhancements under section 1385 and entered judgment accordingly. This is the automatic appeal from that judgment. (§ 1239, subd. (b).) We affirm. I. Facts A. Guilt Phase 1. The Murder of Doris Horrell Defendant robbed and murdered Doris Horrell, a 73-year-old resident of Citrus Heights, on February 13, 1988. Sheriff's deputies found her body about 9:40 p.m. in an open field west of Interstate 5 in Sacramento County, while setting flares to direct traffic out of the Arco Arena. Horrell had left a Valentine's Day party earlier that evening in her car to pick up an acquaintance at the airport. She was wearing a bright red dress, jewelry and designer eyeglasses. Police found no jewelry, eyeglasses, keys or purse. Nor did they find a coat, but they did find three lavender-colored buttons. Post-mortem examination revealed the cause of death as six gunshot wounds to the head and left side of the body, any of which could have been fatal. The shots had been fired at close range from a .22-caliber gun. Horrell's inoperable car was later towed from the side of the freeway, about four miles from the place where her body had been found. Investigators determined that a palm print on the hood of Horrell's car was defendant's and that the fatal bullets had the general characteristics of rounds fired from defendant's .22-caliber revolver.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
July 17
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
119
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
116.9
KB

More Books by California Supreme Court

Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of Hartford Hameid v. National Fire Insurance of Hartford
2003
In re Barnett In re Barnett
2003
Jimenez v. Superior Coourt of San Diego County Jimenez v. Superior Coourt of San Diego County
2002
In re Estate of Joseph In re Estate of Joseph
1998
In re Stephanie M. In re Stephanie M.
1994
People v. Whitfield People v. Whitfield
1994