Pioneer Natural Gas Company v. K & M Paving Company Pioneer Natural Gas Company v. K & M Paving Company

Pioneer Natural Gas Company v. K & M Paving Company

1962.TX.40974 359 S.W.2D 533

Amarillo Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Appellants motion for rehearing earnestly insists that we erred in holding that K & M Paving Company was not a trespasser. To support this position appellant relies principally on Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Vowell Constr. Co., 161 Tex. 432, 341 S.W.2d 148. We are convinced there are distinguishing facts between the instant case and the Vowell case. We therefore do not consider the Vowell case controlling. The primary distinction between the two cases is the notice that had been given to the party whose utility line had been broken. Justice Norvell wrote in the Vowell case:

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1962
September 4
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
3
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
69.9
KB

More Books by Amarillo Court of Civil Appeals of Texas

Cox v. Clay Et Al. Cox v. Clay Et Al.
Cox v. Clay Et Al.
1951
Jung Et Al. v. Dallas Tailor & Laundry Supply Co. Jung Et Al. v. Dallas Tailor & Laundry Supply Co.
Jung Et Al. v. Dallas Tailor & Laundry Supply Co.
1953
Lindsey v. Lindsey Lindsey v. Lindsey
Lindsey v. Lindsey
1950
Leroy Hartman Et Al. v. Jack Harder Et Al. Leroy Hartman Et Al. v. Jack Harder Et Al.
Leroy Hartman Et Al. v. Jack Harder Et Al.
1959
Carlton P. Webb v. Minnie Jo Huffman Et Al. Carlton P. Webb v. Minnie Jo Huffman Et Al.
Carlton P. Webb v. Minnie Jo Huffman Et Al.
1959
O. W. Mathews v. Odell Ryan Et Al. O. W. Mathews v. Odell Ryan Et Al.
O. W. Mathews v. Odell Ryan Et Al.
1958