The First Amendment and FTC Weight-Loss Advertising Regulation. The First Amendment and FTC Weight-Loss Advertising Regulation.

The First Amendment and FTC Weight-Loss Advertising Regulation‪.‬

Journal of Consumer Affairs 2003, Winter, 37, 2

    • $5.99
    • $5.99

Publisher Description

The contemporary American ideal of feminine beauty is a skinny, but voluptuous model like Heidi Klum or Tyra Banks, and the ideal man is a cross between the good looks of Brad Pitt and the raw athletic prowess of Derek Jeter or Michael Jordan. Yet over sixty percent of the adult population in the United States is overweight with nearly thirty percent classified as obese, i.e., having a BMI (Body Mass Index) of 30 or more (USA Today 2002). It is not surprising, then, that Americans spend over $30 billion per year on weight-control products and activities (FTC 2002). It is equally not surprising that this substantial pool of funds has attracted the attention of some less-than-scrupulous individuals seeking to make fraudulent profits off of the misery and weight-loss aspirations of so many. While many programs advocate reduced caloric intake and increased physical activity as the prescription for healthy weight loss at a moderate rate, a significant portion of the industry engages in, at best, what may be described as deceptive advertising and at worse blatantly false advertising. "[F]alse and misleading claims are common in weight-loss advertising, and ... appear to have increased dramatically over the past decade" (FTC 2002, p.vii). There is no doubt that a large number of unscrupulous weight-loss product manufacturers are preying on vulnerable consumers through the use of false and deceptive advertising campaigns. Since 1990, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has brought approximately 90 enforcement actions for false or deceptive weight-loss advertisements or claims and has apparently never lost a case (FTC 2003). Despite these efforts, advertisements with unsubstantiated claims continue to proliferate. While the efforts of the FTC have been laudable, the results have been somewhat less than successful in ameliorating the problem. Yet review of the over 160 cases brought by the FTC since 1927 reveals no meaningful enforcement action against media vehicles (FTC 2003). The weight-loss industry consists mainly of small and transient manufacturers, rendering enforcement efforts aimed at producers nearly futile. The FTC has limited resources which are being inefficiently allocated pursuing enforcement actions against manufacturers. Since there are fewer media vehicles than manufacturers, enforcement action aimed at vehicles would certainly prove a more efficiently allocation of resources.

GENRE
Business & Personal Finance
RELEASED
2003
December 22
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
17
Pages
PUBLISHER
American Council on Consumer Interests
SELLER
The Gale Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation and an affiliate of Cengage Learning, Inc.
SIZE
257
KB
The Federal Trade Commission The Federal Trade Commission
2020
Ethical and Socially Responsible Advertising: Can It be Achieved? Ethical and Socially Responsible Advertising: Can It be Achieved?
2002
Healthcare Antitrust, Settlements, and the Federal Trade Commission Healthcare Antitrust, Settlements, and the Federal Trade Commission
2018
A Pessimist's Simplistic Historical Perspective on the Fourth Wave of Consumer Protection (Editorial Postlude) (Report) A Pessimist's Simplistic Historical Perspective on the Fourth Wave of Consumer Protection (Editorial Postlude) (Report)
2010
Forced Commercial Speech and the Government Speech Doctrine: Discerning and Reducing the Uncertainty Following Johanns V. Livestock Marketing Association. Forced Commercial Speech and the Government Speech Doctrine: Discerning and Reducing the Uncertainty Following Johanns V. Livestock Marketing Association.
2007
American Business Regulation American Business Regulation
2015
Subliminal Advertising and the Perpetual Popularity of Playing to People's Paranoia. Subliminal Advertising and the Perpetual Popularity of Playing to People's Paranoia.
2006
Defining the Consumer Interest: Challenges for Advocates. Defining the Consumer Interest: Challenges for Advocates.
2006
Product Recalls: Gaping Holes in the Nation's Product Safety Net. (Bits, Briefs, And Applications). Product Recalls: Gaping Holes in the Nation's Product Safety Net. (Bits, Briefs, And Applications).
2003
Health Information Consumers Can't Or Don't Want to Use (Editorial POSTLUDE) Health Information Consumers Can't Or Don't Want to Use (Editorial POSTLUDE)
2009
Ivan L. Preston: 1931-2011 (Obituary) Ivan L. Preston: 1931-2011 (Obituary)
2011
Consumer Self-Confidence in Searching for Information (Survey) Consumer Self-Confidence in Searching for Information (Survey)
2009