The Internet Con
How to Seize the Means of Computation
-
- $19.99
-
- $19.99
Publisher Description
When the tech platforms promised a future of "connection," they were lying. They said their "walled gardens" would keep us safe, but those were prison walls.
The platforms locked us into their systems and made us easy pickings, ripe for extaction. Twitter, Facebook and other Big Tech platforms hard to leave by design. They hold hostage the people we love, the communities that matter to us, the audiences and customers we rely on. The impossibility of staying connected to these people after you delete your account has nothing to do with technological limitations: it's a business strategy in service to commodifying your personal life and relationships.
We can - we must - dismantle the tech platforms. In The Internet Con, Cory Doctorow explains how to seize the means of computation, by forcing Silicon Valley to do the thing it fears most: interoperate. Interoperability will tear down the walls between technologies, allowing users leave platforms, remix their media, and reconfigure their devices without corporate permission.
Interoperability is the only route to the rapid and enduring annihilation of the platforms. The Internet Con is the disassembly manual we need to take back our internet.
PUBLISHERS WEEKLY
Journalist and novelist Doctorow (Red Team Blues) details a plan for how to break up Big Tech in this impassioned and perceptive manifesto. Today's large tech companies are legally able to quash "interoperators" (defined as: "new technologies that plug into their services, systems and platforms")—a privilege never granted to the likes of IBM in decades past, according to Doctorow. If the industry's "complex thicket of copyright, patent... and other IP rights" were swept away, Doctorow writes, a healthy market of secondary services would spring up—for instance, a service that could allow a user to message friends on various social media platforms without logging into them directly. Doctorow hypothesizes that legislating in favor of interoperability, and thus righting the market, would be a more direct route to breaking up Big Tech than other forms of antitrust legislation, since it would force big companies to innovate and compete. He also advocates for extralegal, "guerrilla" forms of interoperability. To illustrate his point, Doctorow tours the past several decades of technology history, highlighting such cases as the film industry's attempts to ban the VCR in the 1980s, Apple's reverse engineering of Microsoft Office in the 2000s, and several "right to repair" laws passed over the past decade in Massachusetts. Readers may find Doctorow's analysis too blithe on some points—for example, he is dismissive of the need for the kind of centralized content moderation practiced by giant social media platforms. Still, Doctorow's sense of urgency is contagious.
