The Thames The Thames

The Thames

81 U.S. 98, 1871.SCT.0000150

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Messrs. Barney, Butler, and Parsons, for the appellant: The witnesses do not, indeed, agree as to the purpose for which the bills of lading were transferred, but the facts show that it was as security for the acceptance, and not for the payment of the draft. Thus–– 1. The draft was a time draft, having fifteen days to run, and was taken at the rate of such paper. Van Pelt would have had no motive to buy cotton on credit if his house was not to have the benefit of the purchase till the credit expired.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1871
December 1
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
16
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
54.5
KB

More Books by United States Supreme Court

Folsom v. Dewey. Stringfellow v. Cain (99 U. S. 610) Affirmed Folsom v. Dewey. Stringfellow v. Cain (99 U. S. 610) Affirmed
1880
Alexander Rankin, Cunningham Smith, George C. C. Thurger, And John Mccall, Plaintiffs in Error v. Jesse Hoyt Alexander Rankin, Cunningham Smith, George C. C. Thurger, And John Mccall, Plaintiffs in Error v. Jesse Hoyt
1846
Provident Institution v. Massachusetts Provident Institution v. Massachusetts
1867
One Hundred and Ninety-Nine Barrels of Whiskey v. United States One Hundred and Ninety-Nine Barrels of Whiskey v. United States
1876
James L. and Samuel L. Taylor, Administrators of Robert Taylor, Deceased, Plaintiffs in Error v. Nathan T. Carryl James L. and Samuel L. Taylor, Administrators of Robert Taylor, Deceased, Plaintiffs in Error v. Nathan T. Carryl
1857
Benjamin F. Morgan, Plaintiff in Error v. Alfred G. Curtenius and John L. Griswold Benjamin F. Morgan, Plaintiff in Error v. Alfred G. Curtenius and John L. Griswold
1857