The Thames
81 U.S. 98, 1871.SCT.0000150
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
Messrs. Barney, Butler, and Parsons, for the appellant: The witnesses do not, indeed, agree as to the purpose for which the bills of lading were transferred, but the facts show that it was as security for the acceptance, and not for the payment of the draft. Thus–– 1. The draft was a time draft, having fifteen days to run, and was taken at the rate of such paper. Van Pelt would have had no motive to buy cotton on credit if his house was not to have the benefit of the purchase till the credit expired.
More Books by United States Supreme Court
Folsom v. Dewey. Stringfellow v. Cain (99 U. S. 610) Affirmed
1880
Alexander Rankin, Cunningham Smith, George C. C. Thurger, And John Mccall, Plaintiffs in Error v. Jesse Hoyt
1846
Provident Institution v. Massachusetts
1867
One Hundred and Ninety-Nine Barrels of Whiskey v. United States
1876
James L. and Samuel L. Taylor, Administrators of Robert Taylor, Deceased, Plaintiffs in Error v. Nathan T. Carryl
1857
Benjamin F. Morgan, Plaintiff in Error v. Alfred G. Curtenius and John L. Griswold
1857