Thelma Sutton v. State
TX.40270; 343 S.W.2d 452, 170 Tex. Crim. 617 (1961)
-
- $0.99
-
- $0.99
Publisher Description
The testimony of Armstrong showing prior transactions with appellant was admitted to rebut such theory, and to rebut the defensive
theory that appellant had no intent to possess heroin and possessed it only because she was induced to do so by Armstrong.