Tollefson Development, Inc. v. Mccarthy Tollefson Development, Inc. v. Mccarthy

Tollefson Development, Inc. v. Mccarthy

668 N.W.2d 701, 2003.MN.0001540

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Affirmed OPINION On appeal from the dismissal of its action for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted, appellant argues that the settlement of a separate action to enforce a purchase agreement to transfer real property creates an equitable interest in the land sufficient to sustain this action for partition. We affirm. FACTS

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
2003
September 16
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
61.2
KB
Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optionics Corp. Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optionics Corp.
2003
In re Civil Commitment of Ramey In re Civil Commitment of Ramey
2002
Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. Andrew L. Youngquist, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.
2001
State v. Pearson State v. Pearson
2000
In re Children of Wildey In re Children of Wildey
2003
State v. Cunningham State v. Cunningham
2003