Valenzuela v. Kraft Inc. Valenzuela v. Kraft Inc.

Valenzuela v. Kraft Inc‪.‬

1984.C09.40339 739 F.2D 434

    • $0.99
    • $0.99

Publisher Description

Thomas Menhorn appeals from a judgment upholding Firestone Tire & Rubber Companys denial of Menhorns application for benefits under Firestones employee retirement plan. Menhorn was employed by Firestone at its Akron, Ohio, plant from October 26, 1953, until he resigned on August 11, 1967, to move to California. Although Menhorn alleged otherwise in his complaint, uncontradicted declarations filed in support of Firestones motions below establish that Menhorn was informed before his resignation that he would not receive credit for his years of service in Akron should Firestone reemploy him in California. Menhorn was in fact rehired at Firestones Los Angeles plant on August 16, 1967, where he worked until he was laid off on June 13, 1980.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1984
July 31
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
5
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SELLER
Innodata Book Distribution Services Inc
SIZE
54
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

National Commission on Law Enforcement and Social Justice v. Central Intelligence Agency National Commission on Law Enforcement and Social Justice v. Central Intelligence Agency
1978
Republic Of Philippines V. Marcos Republic Of Philippines V. Marcos
1988
Hilao v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos Hilao v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos
1996
In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation. Budget Rent-a-Car of Washington-Cregon Inc. In re Airport Car Rental Antitrust Litigation. Budget Rent-a-Car of Washington-Cregon Inc.
1982
United States v. Church of Scientology of California and Henning Heldt United States v. Church of Scientology of California and Henning Heldt
1975
U-Haul International Inc. v. Jartran Inc. U-Haul International Inc. v. Jartran Inc.
1986