B. F. Patton and Wife v. H. E. Meddick B. F. Patton and Wife v. H. E. Meddick

B. F. Patton and Wife v. H. E. Meddick

FL.40209; 139 So. 880, 104 Fla. 398 (1932)

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Description de l’éditeur

Per Curiam. -- This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decrees herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there are no errors in the said decrees. The cause having been heretofore before this Court from an order and decree overruling a demurrer to the bill of complaint, Patton v. Meddick, 97 Fla. 1073, 122 So. 710, and affirmed. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the decrees of the Circuit Court be and they are hereby affirmed.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1932
4 mars
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
1
Page
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
56,6
Ko

Plus de livres par Supreme Court of Florida

Post-Newsweek Stations v. John Doe Post-Newsweek Stations v. John Doe
1992
University Hills Beauty Academy Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Co. University Hills Beauty Academy Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Co.
1976
Allen T. White and Mary Frances White v. Pinellas County Allen T. White and Mary Frances White v. Pinellas County
1966
Florida Bar v. Norman F. Solomon Florida Bar v. Norman F. Solomon
1991
Florida Bar J. Charles Shores Florida Bar J. Charles Shores
1991
State Florida v. Ezekiel Peterson State Florida v. Ezekiel Peterson
1996