Comments on William Jaworski’s Essay (2018) "Psychology Without A Mental-Physical Dichotomy" Comments on William Jaworski’s Essay (2018) "Psychology Without A Mental-Physical Dichotomy"
Peirce's Secondness and Aristotle's Hylomorphism

Comments on William Jaworski’s Essay (2018) "Psychology Without A Mental-Physical Dichotomy‪"‬

    • CHF 2.00
    • CHF 2.00

Beschreibung des Verlags

William Jaworski considers the modern mental-physical dichotomy from a Neo-Aristotelian point of view. His article appears in “Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives On Contemporary Science” (edited by William M.R. Simpson, Robert C. Koons and Nicholas Teh, 2018, Routledge Press, pages 261-292). This book belongs to the Routledge Studies in the Philosophy of Science.
These comments take Jaworski’s argument one step further, by associating Neo-Aristotelian concepts with Peirce’s categorical framework, especially the category-based nested form. The resulting view may be called postmodern neoscholastic.
Why the connection?
Charles Peirce picks up where the Baroque scholastics of the seventeenth century leave off. These comments locate the mental-physical dichotomy within the noumenon, the thing itself, rather than psychological phenomena, based on the character of the Positivist’s and empirio-schematic judgments.
‘Body [substantiates] soul’ belongs to the noumenon of human psychology.
A noumenon cannot be objectified as its phenomena.
Phenomena are the observable and measurable manifestations of a noumenon.
Ramifications become apparent as the commentary proceeds.

GENRE
Gesundheit, Körper und Geist
ERSCHIENEN
2020
27. November
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
24
Seiten
VERLAG
Razie Mah
GRÖSSE
441.9
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Razie Mah

Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory
2015
Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 2 Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 2
2024
Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 1 Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 1
2024
Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 1 Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 1
2024
Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 2 Comments on Michael Tomasello's Arc of Inquiry (1999-2019) Part 2
2024
Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything"
2023

Andere Bücher in dieser Reihe

Comments on Christopher Austin and Anna Marmodoro's Essay (2018) "Structural Powers" Comments on Christopher Austin and Anna Marmodoro's Essay (2018) "Structural Powers"
2020
Comments on Janice Breidenbach’s Essay (2018) "Action, Agency, and Substance Causation" Comments on Janice Breidenbach’s Essay (2018) "Action, Agency, and Substance Causation"
2020
Comments on Christopher Austin’s Essay (2018) "A Biologically Informed Hylomorphism" Comments on Christopher Austin’s Essay (2018) "A Biologically Informed Hylomorphism"
2020
Comments on Daniel De Haan’s Essay (2018) "Hylomorphism and the New Mechanist Philosophy" Comments on Daniel De Haan’s Essay (2018) "Hylomorphism and the New Mechanist Philosophy"
2020
Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism" Comments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism"
2020
Comments on Miguel Espinoza's Essay (2012) "Physics and the Intelligibility of Nature" Comments on Miguel Espinoza's Essay (2012) "Physics and the Intelligibility of Nature"
2018