H.T. Coker Construction Co. V. Whitfield Transportation Inc. H.T. Coker Construction Co. V. Whitfield Transportation Inc.

H.T. Coker Construction Co. V. Whitfield Transportation Inc‪.‬

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Beschreibung des Verlags

This appeal involves two claims of damage to merchandise shipped by the manufacturer in California to plaintiff in Alamogordo, New Mexico. Defendant is a common carrier "* * * operating pursuant to the laws of the United States and the regulations of the Interstate Commerce Commission." "* * * [U]nder federal law, in an action to recover from a carrier for damage to a shipment, the shipper establishes his prima facie case when he shows delivery in good condition, arrival in damaged condition, and the amount of damages. * * *" Missouri P.R. Co. v. Elmore & Stahl, 377 U.S. 134, 84 S. Ct. 1142, 12 L. Ed. 2d 194, reh. denied, 377 U.S. 984, 84 S. Ct. 1880, 12 L. Ed. 2d 752 (1964). The application of this rule is dispositive. In applying the rule we discuss: (1) findings of fact and conclusions of law; (2) answers to interrogatories; and (3) probative value of hearsay.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1974
9. Januar
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
11
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
71
 kB

Mehr Bücher von New Mexico Court of Appeals

Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz
1995
Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto
1995
Clayton v. Farmington City Council Clayton v. Farmington City Council
1995
In re Estate of Strozzi In re Estate of Strozzi
1995
State v. Curry State v. Curry
2002
State v. Fike State v. Fike
2002