Hare v. Butler Hare v. Butler

Hare v. Butler

1990.NC.40713 ; 99 N.C. App. 693; 394 S.E.2d 231

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Beschreibung des Verlags

[1] Initially, we must decide if this appeal is interlocutory and therefore inappropriate at this time. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 54(b) (1983). The judgment below is not final as to all claims and parties. However, we find that plaintiff has a substantial right to have all of his claims for relief tried at the same time before the same judge and jury, and therefore allow this appeal. Shelton v. Fairley, 86 N.C. App. 147, 356 S.E.2d 917, cert. denied, 320 N.C. 634, 360 S.E.2d 94 (1987); see Nance v. Robertson, 91 N.C. App. 121, 370 S.E.2d 283, disc. rev. denied, 323 N.C. 477, 373 S.E.2d 865 (1988).

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1990
7. August
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
7
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
51.5
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Powell v. S & G Prestress Co. Powell v. S & G Prestress Co.
1994
Kraft Foodservice Inc. v. Hardee Kraft Foodservice Inc. v. Hardee
1994
State v. Legrande State v. Legrande
1968
Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. Grant v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
1968
Wm. Muirhead Construction Co. v. Housing Authority Wm. Muirhead Construction Co. v. Housing Authority
1968
Bost v. Citizens National Bank Bost v. Citizens National Bank
1968