In re Barnett
31 Cal.4th 466, 73 P.3d 1106, 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 108, 2003.CA.0007480, 3 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7028, A.R. 8794(2003 Daily Journal D)
-
- CHF 1.00
-
- CHF 1.00
Beschreibung des Verlags
Petitioner Lee Max Barnett is being held in custody pursuant to a judgment of death rendered on November 30, 1988. Petitioner is represented by appointed counsel in this state habeas corpus proceeding challenging the legality of that judgment. Despite such representation, petitioner has submitted a number of pro se habeas corpus claims, motions, and other documents to this court for filing and consideration. Because this court has begun to receive a number of pro se submissions in capital habeas corpus matters, and because our actions thereon have at times varied, we find it appropriate to announce a standard procedure for such submissions. Consistent with the general rule that represented parties have no right to present their cases personally alongside counsel-a principle we have recognized in the context of both capital trials and appeals, and non-capital habeas corpus proceedings as well-this court will not file or consider a represented capital inmate's pro se submissions that challenge the legality of the inmate's death judgment or otherwise fall within the scope of counsel's representation. Conversely, we shall file and consider a represented capital inmate's pro se submissions that pertain to matters falling outside the scope of counsel's representation. We shall also file and consider pro se motions limited to matters concerning the inmate's representation. (See People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 (Marsden) [motion to substitute counsel].) I.