L.S. Ayres & Co. Et Al. v. Ipalco Et Al. L.S. Ayres & Co. Et Al. v. Ipalco Et Al.

L.S. Ayres & Co. Et Al. v. Ipalco Et Al‪.‬

1976.IN.30291; 351 N.E.2D 814; 169 IND. APP. 652

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Description de l’éditeur

Commission to increase its electric rates. A new rate increase would affect 270,454 ratepayers in Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion, Morgan, Owen, Putnam, and Shelby Counties.[Footnote 1] The old rates had been in effect since August 1, 1938. In its petition to increase electric rates, the Petitioner, Indianapolis Power & Light Company, stressed the narrowing margin over past years between its operating revenues and operating expenses. This narrowing margin had resulted in a denial of a fair return to the Petitioner upon the fair value of its utility properties. The new rates proposed by the Petitioner would increase operating revenues approximately $14,700,000.00 and would increase income approximately $6,800,000.00 per year.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1976
12 juillet
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
73
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
93,9
Ko

Plus de livres par First District Court of Appeals of Indiana

Smart Corporation v. Kathy Grider Smart Corporation v. Kathy Grider
1995
Haas Carriage v. Mearl Berna Haas Carriage v. Mearl Berna
1995
James M. Ridenour v. Clay Furness James M. Ridenour v. Clay Furness
1987
Parke County v. Ropak Parke County v. Ropak
1988
F. H. Porter v. C. J. Porter F. H. Porter v. C. J. Porter
1988
Honda Motor Company v. Maxine Parks Honda Motor Company v. Maxine Parks
1985