Nabat v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co. Nabat v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.

Nabat v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co‪.‬

45 F.3D 432, 1995.C07.40386

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Description de l’éditeur

Samuel Nabat, a former insurance agent for Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, brought this action alleging that Aetna eliminated his position as product manager, terminated his employment, and refused to offer him another position within the company because of his age (58 years old), in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. The district court concluded that no reasonable jury could have found that age was a determining factor in Aetnas employment decisions and granted summary judgment for Aetna. Nabat appeals. We affirm.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1995
9 janvier
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
18
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
67,9
Ko

Plus de livres par United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Covad Communications Co. v. Bell Atlantic Corp. Covad Communications Co. v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
2005
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
2004
Albrecht v. Committee on Employee Benefits of the Federal Reserve Employee Benefits Systems Albrecht v. Committee on Employee Benefits of the Federal Reserve Employee Benefits Systems
2004
In re Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan In re Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan
2003
United States v. Bailey United States v. Bailey
1994
Wagner v. Taylor Wagner v. Taylor
1987