Nabisco Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co. Nabisco Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.

Nabisco Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co‪.‬

1983.CA.40698 143 CAL. APP. 3D 831; 192 CAL. RPTR. 207

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Description de l’éditeur

The City of Oakland and various officials for the City of Oakland and for the County of Alameda (collectively City) are respondents below in a taxpayer action for declaratory relief brought under Revenue and Taxation Code section 4808 by petitioner George Valentine on behalf of himself and other taxpayers similarly situated. City appeals from a judgment declaring that a property tax override levied by resolution of the Oakland City Council (Council) designated "1981 Pension Liability Fund" is void and unconstitutional as contravening article XIII A of the California Constitution, and also from a subsequent order awarding Valentine attorney fees.

GENRE
Professionnel et technique
SORTIE
1983
10 juin
LANGUE
EN
Anglais
LONGUEUR
7
Pages
ÉDITIONS
LawApp Publishers
TAILLE
66,7
Ko

Plus de livres par Fourth Appellate District, Division Three Court of Appeal of California

Zambrano v. Dorough Zambrano v. Dorough
1986
Haight v. Handweiler Haight v. Handweiler
1988
Little v. Harbor Pacific Mortgage Investors No. 79B Little v. Harbor Pacific Mortgage Investors No. 79B
1985
Hollingsworth v. Superior Court of Orange County Hollingsworth v. Superior Court of Orange County
1987
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Superior Court of Orange County State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Superior Court of Orange County
1987
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek Anaheim Redevelopment Agency v. Dusek
1987