Neff v. Hendricks

Appellees seek to restrain appellants from engaging in business in an area originally designated as Cloudcroft or Place Cloudcroft, now a part of the Village of Cloudcroft. The question presented is whether the premises involved are encumbered by reciprocal negative easement imposed by the dedicator, the Cloudcroft Company, as a common vendor for the benefit of itself and all purchasers of lots and blocks within the area, and if so, have the various owners been divested of the right to enforce the restrictions by reason of waiver or changed condition.