People v. Dancy People v. Dancy

People v. Dancy

102 CAL.APP.4TH 21, 124 CAL.RPTR.2D 898, 2002.CA.0008443 , 2 CAL. DAILY OP. SERV. 9513, 2002 DAILY JOURNAL D.A.R. 10,650

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Beschreibung des Verlags

This appeal arises in an action for fraud and breach of contract brought by Louis Navellier (Navellier) and Navellier Management, Inc. (NMI; collectively, plaintiffs) against Kenneth Sletten (defendant). Defendant moved to strike the complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16; hereafter § 425.16), the motion was denied, and we affirmed (Navellier v. Sletten (December 27, 2000, A090058) [nonpub. opn.]). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded with instructions to reconsider our decision in light of its opinion. (Navellier v. Sletten (2002) 29 Cal.4th 82, 96.)

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
2002
13. September
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
51
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
81.1
 kB
People v. Crayton People v. Crayton
1999
Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400 Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400
1999
Ali v. City of Los Angeles Ali v. City of Los Angeles
1999
County of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles County of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles
1999
County of Orange v. Carl D. County of Orange v. Carl D.
1999
Boehm & Associates v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Boehm & Associates v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
1999