![State v. Woinarowicz](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![State v. Woinarowicz](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
State v. Woinarowicz
720 N.W.2d 635, 2006 ND 179, ND.0000174(2006)
-
- CHF 1.00
-
- CHF 1.00
Descrizione dell’editore
AFFIRMED. [¶1] Jami Woinarowicz appeals from her conviction entered upon a conditional plea of guilty to charges of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. Woinarowicz claims evidence discovered during a search of the hotel room should have been suppressed, and the district court erred in allowing hearsay testimony at the suppression hearing. We affirm Woinarowicz's conviction.