![United States V. Dominguez-Ochoa](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![United States V. Dominguez-Ochoa](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
United States V. Dominguez-Ochoa
-
- CHF 1.00
-
- CHF 1.00
Beschreibung des Verlags
Primarily at issue is whether, for Sentencing Guidelines purposes, criminally negligent homicide under Texas law is equivalent to manslaughter and, therefore, an enumerated crime of violence under Guidelines § 2L1.2, permitting the 16-level enhancement imposed against Felipe de Jesus Dominguez-Ochoa. See U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 cmt. n.1(B)(ii)(II) (2002). Criminally negligent homicide has a mens rea of negligence; generic, contemporary manslaughter, of recklessness. Therefore, the two offenses are not equivalent. The enhancement is VACATED ; the case is REMANDED for resentencing.