Vance v. Union Planters Corp. Vance v. Union Planters Corp.

Vance v. Union Planters Corp‪.‬

209 F.3d 438, 2000.C05.0042227 , 82 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1199, Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1199(82 Fair Empl)

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Beschreibung des Verlags

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi Yvonne Vance sued Union Planters Bank, N.A. (""Union Planters""), under title VII, alleging discriminatory failure to promote on the basis of sex. A jury awarded $30,000 for lost wages and benefits, $20,000 for emotional distress, and $390,000 in punitive damages. The district court later reduced the total amount awarded to $330,000 because of title VII's statutory limits on employer liability. Union Planters appealed, asserting that (1) no reasonable jury could have found sex discrimination, (2) the court erred in allowing the jury to hear evidence that Union Planters had previously been found to have violated the Equal Pay Act, and (3) the district court erroneously determined Union Planters's size for purposes of the statutory liability limits. We affirm with regard to the first two issues and vacate and remand on the third issue. I.

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
2000
25. April
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
20
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
71.4
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

Elvis Presley Enterprises Elvis Presley Enterprises
1998
Littles v. Board of Pardons and Paroles Division Littles v. Board of Pardons and Paroles Division
1995
Meadowbriar Home for Children Inc. v. Gunn Meadowbriar Home for Children Inc. v. Gunn
1996
Ingalls Shipbuilding Inc. v. Director Ingalls Shipbuilding Inc. v. Director
1995
United States v. Neely United States v. Neely
2003
Dickerson v. Bailey Dickerson v. Bailey
2003