Veazie Bank v. Fenno
75 U.S. 533, 1869.SCT.0000025
-
- CHF 1.00
-
- CHF 1.00
Beschreibung des Verlags
Mr. Hoar, Attorney-General of the United States, argued the case fully, contra; he relying upon the case of Hylton v. The United States,2 as conclusive of the question independently of principle; and referring to the brief recently published3 of General Hamilton, by whom the case was argued, to explain and support his view of what was there decided; a case confirmed recently, the Attorney-General observed, in Pacific Insurance Company v. Soule.4 In reply, it was contended that Hylton v. The United States adjudged one point alone, which was that a tax on carriages was not a direct tax, and that from the dicta of the judges, in the case, it was obvious that the great question of what were direct taxes was but crudely considered.
Mehr Bücher von United States Supreme Court
Alexander Rankin, Cunningham Smith, George C. C. Thurger, And John Mccall, Plaintiffs in Error v. Jesse Hoyt
1846
The Java
1871
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Evidence Annotated 2023
2023
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Annotated 2023
2023