Venaglia v. Kropinak Venaglia v. Kropinak

Venaglia v. Kropinak

125 N.M. 25, 956 P.2d 824, NM.40002(1998)

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Beschreibung des Verlags

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY C. BURTON COSGROVE, District Judge {1} The Appellants, Frank Venaglia, Ann P. Venaglia, and Roy J. Venaglia (the Venaglias), sued Roy M. Kropinak on his guarantee of a $68,000 promissory note from Downtown Business Center, Inc. (DBC) to the Venaglias. On cross-motions for summary judgment the district court granted Kropinak's motion and denied the Venaglias'. The Venaglias appeal, asking that we set aside the summary judgment against them and order the district court to enter summary judgment in their favor. This appeal requires us to examine suretyship defenses under the Uniform Commercial Code (the UCC) and the common law, and the relationship between these two sources of law. We hold that the record before us will not sustain a summary judgment for either party. We therefore reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings. I. BACKGROUND

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1998
3. Februar
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
31
Seiten
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
66
 kB

Mehr Bücher von New Mexico Court of Appeals

Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz
1995
Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto
1995
Clayton v. Farmington City Council Clayton v. Farmington City Council
1995
In re Estate of Strozzi In re Estate of Strozzi
1995
State v. Curry State v. Curry
2002
State v. Fike State v. Fike
2002