![Verhaagh v. Farah](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Verhaagh v. Farah](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Verhaagh v. Farah
751 N.W.2d 902, 312 Wis.2d 479, 2008.WI.0000324
-
- CHF 1.00
-
- CHF 1.00
Beschreibung des Verlags
1 Steven VerHaagh appeals a judgment declaring Penn America Insurance Companys commercial general liability policy ("CGL") provided no coverage for damages arising from a bar fight. VerHaagh argues: (1) the policy in its entirety is contextually ambiguous; (2) the declaration page is ambiguous and illusory; (3) the endorsement page is ambiguous and illusory; and (4) the assault and battery exclusion is ambiguous. We disagree and affirm.