Vernell Godfrey v. County Nassau Vernell Godfrey v. County Nassau

Vernell Godfrey v. County Nassau

NY.42583; 262 N.Y.S.2d 60; 24 A.D.2d 569 (1965)

    • CHF 1.00
    • CHF 1.00

Beschreibung des Verlags

It is our opinion that plaintiff may properly invoke that doctrine on this appeal, although specific acts of negligence were alleged in the complaint, since there was no attempt to prove those acts on the trial (cf. Manley v. New York Tel. Co., 303 N. Y. 18; Fischer v. Johnson & Sons, 20 Misc. 2d 891). However, it is also our opinion that, on the record presented, defendant did not have such exclusive control of the manhole cover as would justify the application of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine (cf. Galbraith v. Busch, 267 N. Y. 230, 234; George v. City of New York, 22 A.D.2d 70, 71; Anno., 174 A. L. R. 608-611).

GENRE
Gewerbe und Technik
ERSCHIENEN
1965
6. Juli
SPRACHE
EN
Englisch
UMFANG
1
Seite
VERLAG
LawApp Publishers
GRÖSSE
59.6
 kB

Mehr Bücher von Supreme Court of New York

Matter Emily F. Ramos v. Department Mental Hygiene State New York Et Al. Matter Emily F. Ramos v. Department Mental Hygiene State New York Et Al.
1970
Hwesu S. Murray Hwesu S. Murray
1991
Bsl Development Corp. Bsl Development Corp.
1991
Matter West Branch Conservation Association v. Planning Board Matter West Branch Conservation Association v. Planning Board
1991
Alberta Horton Et Al. v. City Schenectady Alberta Horton Et Al. v. City Schenectady
1991
Joyce Schumacher Et Al. v. Lutheran Community Services Joyce Schumacher Et Al. v. Lutheran Community Services
1991