![Vey Mclain v. State Texas](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Vey Mclain v. State Texas](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Vey Mclain v. State Texas
TX.41197; 383 S.W.2d 407 (1964)
-
- CHF 1.00
-
- CHF 1.00
Beschreibung des Verlags
Appellant insists that Terry v. State, 149 Tex.Cr.App. 110, 191 S.W.2d 736, supports his contention that the 1953 conviction for passing a forged instrument, used by the state for enhancement, was
not a final conviction because the judgment introduced in evidence and reciting that the court accepted his plea of guilty
and assessed punishment at five years, contained portions of the printed form applicable to a plea of guilty before a jury
which were not deleted.