![Victor V. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Victor V. State](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Victor V. State
-
- CHF 1.00
-
- CHF 1.00
Beschreibung des Verlags
Kim Novell Victor appeals his conviction by a jury for possession of less than one gram of cocaine. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(b) (Vernon 1992 & Supp. 1999). The jury assessed his punishment at 16 years, enhanced by two prior felony convictions. In six points of error, appellant contends: (1) the evidence is factually insufficient to support his conviction for knowingly possessing cocaine; (2) the trial court erred in denying his request for a jury instruction to disregard illegally obtained evidence under article 38.23, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure; (3) the trial court erred in denying his Batson*fn1 motion; (4) the trial court erred in overruling his objection to the prosecutor's reference to an extraneous bad act; and (5) and (6) the police did not have probable cause to arrest appellant under the state and federal constitutions. We affirm.