- USD 0.99
Descripción de editorial
DECISION & ORDER The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in rendering a Sandoval ruling by which
the prosecutor would be permitted to cross-examine the defendant as to his previous felony conviction without any inquiry
into the underlying circumstances (see, People v Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371, 377; People v Edwards, 159 A.D.2d 583, 584). Moreover, there is no merit to the defendant's contention that CPL 250.20 is unconstitutional (see, People v Gill, 164 A.D.2d
867; People v Peterson, 96 A.D.2d 871).