A. E. Hagberg and Carl Burnett v. Alaska A. E. Hagberg and Carl Burnett v. Alaska

A. E. Hagberg and Carl Burnett v. Alaska

AK.218 , 585 P.2d 559 (1978)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

MATTHEWS, Justice. OPINION. In 1976, the law pertaining to deed of trust sales, AS 34.20.070, was amended to permit the obligor under a note secured by a deed of trust to terminate a non-judicial deed of trust sale by paying all arrearages except those due because the acceleration clause 1 in the note has been exercised. 2 Prior law required payment of the full indebtedness when acceleration clauses were exercised. The question in this case is whether application of the 1976 amendment to deeds of trust executed before but foreclosed after the amendment became effective is prohibited by the contract clause of the Federal Constitution, which provides: No state shall... pass any law impairing the obligations of contract. 3 I

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1978
27 October
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
8
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
62.9
KB

More Books by Supreme Court of Alaska

Beers v. Jim Robison Beers v. Jim Robison
1985
Butler v. Dunlap Butler v. Dunlap
1997
State v. Arbuckle State v. Arbuckle
1997
Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska Benedict v. Key Bank of Alaska
1996
Voigt v. Snowden Voigt v. Snowden
1996
Ahwinona v. State Ahwinona v. State
1996