![Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Thomas P. O'Connor Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Thomas P. O'Connor Et Al.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Thomas P. O'Connor Et Al.
NY.47766; 170 N.E.2d 681; 8 N.Y.2d 359 (1960)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
The question for decision, one of first impression in this court, is this: Does the New York Automobile Assigned Risk Plan of insurance, which in explicit terms provides only for prospective cancellation, abrogate the insurer's common-law right to void a policy from its inception on the ground that it had been obtained through fraud or misrepresentation?