![Back to the Future of Abortion Law: Roe's Rejection of America's History and Traditions.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Back to the Future of Abortion Law: Roe's Rejection of America's History and Traditions.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Back to the Future of Abortion Law: Roe's Rejection of America's History and Traditions.
Issues in Law & Medicine 2006, Summer, 22, 1
-
- 2,99 €
-
- 2,99 €
Publisher Description
Abstract: In Roe v. Wade much of Justice Blackmun's judgment was devoted to the history of abortion in Anglo-American law. He concluded that a constitutional right to abortion was consistent with that history. In Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 281 American historians signed an amicus brief which claimed that Roe was consistent with the nation's history and traditions. This article respectfully questions Justice Blackmun's conclusion and the historians' claim. **********
More Books by Issues in Law & Medicine
Creating Clones, Kids & Chimera: Liberal Democratic Compromise at the Crossroads.
2004
The Question of the Constitutional Case Against Suicide: An Historiographical and Originalist Inquiry Into the Degree to Which the Theory of the Inalienable Right to Life and Liberty is Enforced by the Thirteenth Amendment.
2010
Other People's Lives: Reflections on Medicine, Ethics, And Euthanasia.
2010
Female Feticide in India.
2010
Non-Treatment Decisions on Grounds of "Medical Futility" and "Quality of Life": Interviews with Fourteen Dutch Neonatologists.
2010
The Neurological Determination of Death: What Does It Really Mean?
2007