Baer v. Regents of University of California Baer v. Regents of University of California

Baer v. Regents of University of California

118 N.M. 685, 884 P.2d 841, NM.40154(1994)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

ALARID, Judge. This appeal concerns a claim for wrongful death as a result of medical malpractice. The district court granted summary judgment
in favor of Defendants, and Plaintiff appeals. The dispositive issue is whether a legally recognizable duty exists between
a health care provider and an examinee in situations in which employees are required to undergo physical examinations as a
condition of obtaining or retaining employment. For the reasons explained below, we hold such a duty does exist. We therefore
reverse the summary judgment granted Defendant Regents of the University of California (Regents) as employer of James Pederson
(Pederson), the physician's assistant who examined Plaintiff's decedent. However, we affirm the summary judgment granted Defendant
Dr. Williams because Plaintiff's cause of action against him is barred by the statute of limitations.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1994
8 September
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
13
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
67.1
KB

More Books by New Mexico Court of Appeals

Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz Sandoval County Board of Commissioners v. Ruiz
1995
Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto Joseph C. Monsanto v. Mary Elizabeth Monsanto
1995
Clayton v. Farmington City Council Clayton v. Farmington City Council
1995
In re Estate of Strozzi In re Estate of Strozzi
1995
State v. Curry State v. Curry
2002
State v. Fike State v. Fike
2002