Bailey v. Amsted Industries Bailey v. Amsted Industries

Bailey v. Amsted Industries

172 F.3d 1041, 9 A.D. Cases 292, 1999.C08.42372 , 2d (BNA) 397(5 Wage & Hour Cas)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa Submitted: February 11, 1999 Hugh M. Bailey was discharged by his employer, Griffin Pipe Products Company (Griffin Pipe), a division of Amsted Industries Inc., after a large number of unexcused absences from work. Bailey sued Griffin Pipe for violating the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., the Iowa Civil Rights Act (ICRA), and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. The case was tried to the court1 which found for Griffin Pipe, and Bailey appeals. We affirm.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1999
8 April
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
63.2
KB

More Books by Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals

United States v. Smith United States v. Smith
1995
Fox v. Erickson Fox v. Erickson
1995
Robinson v. Boulier Robinson v. Boulier
1995
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission and Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Federal Communications Commission and
1998
United States v. Hawkins United States v. Hawkins
2000
Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris usa Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris usa
2003