Bartelt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co‪.‬

1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals a non-final order denying its summary judgment motion. The circuit court determined there was a disputed material fact regarding whether statements by State Farms agent resulted in a reformation of Michael Peeters homeowners insurance resulting in coverage for Peeters vehicle. State Farm argues its agent could not orally reform Peeters homeowners policy to provide coverage for the vehicle. We agree and reverse the order.