Bartholet V. Reishauer A.G. Bartholet V. Reishauer A.G.

Bartholet V. Reishauer A.G‪.‬

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge. Emil Bartholet's case summons up a doctrine only a Judge could love. Usually the plaintiff is master of his pleadings. The complaint stakes out a claim, and the allegations of the complaint determine whether the claim arises under state or federal law. See Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 100 L. Ed. 2d 811, 108 S. Ct. 2166, 7 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1109 (1988). If the complaint invokes state law, and the defendant believes that federal law supplies a defense, the court in which the plaintiff files the suit will determine the validity of the defense. When the parties are citizens of the same state, the process is simple. Plaintiff picks a theory (state or federal); the theory prescribes the appropriate court, which decides the case (including the defenses).

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1992
15 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
11
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
60.2
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Mulholland v. Aaa Food Service Inc. Mulholland v. Aaa Food Service Inc.
1990
Rosenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Rosenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1993
Cannaday v. Gibas Cannaday v. Gibas
1992
Holman v. Lotter Holman v. Lotter
1992
Mccabe v. Caleel Mccabe v. Caleel
1991
United States v. Farmer United States v. Farmer
1991