Farnham v. State Bar of California Farnham v. State Bar of California

Farnham v. State Bar of California

1988.CA.40095 763 P.2D 1339; 253 CAL. RPTR. 249; 47 CAL. 3D 429

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

In this case we are asked to decide whether a trial court committed reversible error in failing to issue a written statement of decision after a request from counsel following a one-day trial, and whether respondent Monterey County Department of Social Services institution of a policy of "protected time" for its employees was a mandatory subject of bargaining under the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (hereinafter referred to as MMBA), Government Code section 3500 et seq. We need not reach the latter issue, since we conclude that counsels request for a statement of decision was timely made, and that the trial courts failure to issue such a statement was reversible error.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1988
1 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
28
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
73.4
KB

More Books by Supreme Court Of California

Borre v. State Bar of California Borre v. State Bar of California
1991
Kipp v. Kipp Kipp v. Kipp
1954
Donovan v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County Donovan v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
1952
Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles
1953
Schlothan v. Rusalem Schlothan v. Rusalem
1953
People v. Bechtel People v. Bechtel
1953