Farrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood Farrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood

Farrand v. Lutheran Brotherhood

1993.C07.41134 ; 993 F.2D 1253

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Per Curiam. Our opinion holds that the rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers do not provide for arbitration of employment disputes. Although we acknowledged that the language of the NASDs rules could be stretched to cover such disputes, we concluded that this was not the most natural reading and added: "Neither the SEC nor the NASD has published an interpretation of this language. The NASD adopted its Code of Arbitration Procedure in 1968, when the rules of such organizations did not require the SECs approval. Until the 1975 amendments to §§ 15A and 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78o-3, 78s(b)(1), changes in the NASDs rules became effective unless the SEC objected. The NASD did not have to submit explanations of its rules, and the SEC did not explain why it let them go into force. So there is no paper trail that might assist in interpretation." Slip op. at 4.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1993
7 June
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
5
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
58.4
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Mulholland v. Aaa Food Service Inc. Mulholland v. Aaa Food Service Inc.
1990
Rosenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Rosenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1993
Cannaday v. Gibas Cannaday v. Gibas
1992
Holman v. Lotter Holman v. Lotter
1992
Mccabe v. Caleel Mccabe v. Caleel
1991
United States v. Farmer United States v. Farmer
1991