![Gary William Music v. Department of Motor Vehicles](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Gary William Music v. Department of Motor Vehicles](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Gary William Music v. Department of Motor Vehicles
1990.CA.40624 221 CAL. APP. 3D 841; 270 CAL. RPTR. 692
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
We hold that when a defendant challenges a certification that he has regained mental competence (Pen. Code, § 1372, subd. (a)(1)) and demands a hearing (§ 1372, subd. (c)), the section 1369, subdivision (f) presumption ("It shall be presumed that the defendant is mentally competent unless it is proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant is mentally incompetent") applies at that hearing.