![Gast Construction Company v. Brighton](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Gast Construction Company v. Brighton](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Gast Construction Company v. Brighton
ND.95 , 422 N.W.2d 389 (1988)
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
LEVINE, Justice. Brighton Partnership (Brighton) attempts to appeal from three orders: an order dismissing with prejudice its counterclaim
against Gast Construction Co., Inc. (Gast); an order dismissing with prejudice its counterclaim against Rogers, Perlenfein
& Associates (Rogers); and an order assessing attorney's fees for bringing a frivolous motion for summary judgment. We
dismiss the appeal.