Gehring v. Case Corp. Gehring v. Case Corp.

Gehring v. Case Corp‪.‬

1994.C07.40015 ; 43 F.3D 340

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

Case Corporation (formerly J.I. Case Corp.) is one of the worlds leading producers of construction and agricultural machinery. Selling in a global market, Case has been under intense competitive pressure, and its older facilities have not flourished. The plant in Wausau, Wisconsin, had been shrinking steadily when in June 1991 management told Ray Watson, the Controller at Wausau, that he would have to make do with two cost accountants rather than five. Dale Gehring was among the three Watson picked to let go. Gehring had been a supervisor until 1988, when an earlier reduction in force returned him to a line position. Watson believed that Gehring had not adjusted well and was reluctant to do the drudge work of ordinary cost accountancy. Gehring believes that his age (52 at the time) rather than his attitude accounts for the decision, but the jury believed Watsons explanation and returned a verdict for Case. Gehring asks us to award him another trial. (The Wausau plant closed in October 1993, but Gehring could recover for wages lost between June 1991 and October 1993 if his age led to the earlier discharge.)

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1994
28 December
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
9
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
57.3
KB

More Books by United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Mulholland v. Aaa Food Service Inc. Mulholland v. Aaa Food Service Inc.
1990
Rosenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Rosenbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
1993
Cannaday v. Gibas Cannaday v. Gibas
1992
Holman v. Lotter Holman v. Lotter
1992
Mccabe v. Caleel Mccabe v. Caleel
1991
United States v. Farmer United States v. Farmer
1991