George Rosales and Ester Rivera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company George Rosales and Ester Rivera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

George Rosales and Ester Rivera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

1992.TX.41453; 835 S.W.2D 804

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

George Rosales and Ester Rivera sued State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance to recover underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits under a Texas Standard Liability Policy issued to Sharon Barrett. The trial court concluded that Rosales and Rivera could not obtain both liability and UIM benefits under a single insurance policy, and granted summary judgment in favor of State Farm. Rosales and Rivera do not argue that genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment in this cause, but that the trial court incorrectly applied substantive law to reach an erroneous result. We will affirm the trial-court judgment.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1992
12 August
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
6
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
79.1
KB

More Books by Third District, Austin Court of Appeals of Texas

Matter C. L Matter C. L
1994
Thermon Maurice Skillern v. State Texas Thermon Maurice Skillern v. State Texas
1994
Jason Earl Montgomery v. State Texas Jason Earl Montgomery v. State Texas
1994
Benedum Estate Benedum Estate
1967
Marc Whitworth V. State Texas (04/10/91) Marc Whitworth V. State Texas (04/10/91)
1991
Brooks Building Tax Assessment Case. Brooks Building Tax Assessment Case.
1958