![George Sistrunk v. Margaret Sistrunk](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![George Sistrunk v. Margaret Sistrunk](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
George Sistrunk v. Margaret Sistrunk
1970.FL.41046 235 SO. 2D 53
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
McQueen appeals from his conviction for buying, receiving, or aiding in the concealment of stolen property in violation of F.S. § 811.16. Because the state did not establish, even prima facie, the corpus delicti of the crime, apart from the defendants confession, we reverse.
More Books by Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida
John Jorgensen v. Grand Union Company
1986
Eagleman v. Eagleman
1996
Mary Lee Sutherland and United States America v. George Pelegrino Trodella and Indiana Insurance Company
1986
Emil Rossodivita v. King's Surf Ltd.
1971
David Demarois v. Military Park Fire Control Tax District No. 4 and Public Employees Relations Commission
1984
Condor Merritt v. Earl Unkefer and Hunt Construction Company
1968