![George Sollitt Corp. V. Howard Chapman Plumbing & Heating Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![George Sollitt Corp. V. Howard Chapman Plumbing & Heating Inc.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
George Sollitt Corp. V. Howard Chapman Plumbing & Heating Inc.
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
The George Sollitt Corporation (Sollitt) appeals from a declaratory judgment in favor of Howard Chapman Plumbing & Heating, Inc. (Chapman), contending that its work subcontract required Chapman to indemnify and defend it in a negligence action brought by one of Chapman's employees. We agree that Chapman has a duty to defend and reverse.
More Books by Division Two Court of Appeals of Washington
Vancouver School District No. 37 v. Service Employees International Union
1996
Herring v. Department of Social and Health Services
1996
In re Marriage of Dugan-Gaunt
1996
Mailloux v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
1995
In re Marriage of Kastanas
1995
Willis v. Simpson Investment Co.
1995