![Georgetown v. Bank of Idaho Springs.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![Georgetown v. Bank of Idaho Springs.](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
![](/assets/artwork/1x1-42817eea7ade52607a760cbee00d1495.gif)
Georgetown v. Bank of Idaho Springs.
64 P.2D 132, 99 COLO. 519, 1936.CO.40006
-
- 0,99 €
-
- 0,99 €
Publisher Description
A SUIT for an accounting on a written contract set forth in an amended complaint. The right to maintain the suit was challenged by demurrer on the ground that the contract was contrary to public policy and void. The demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff, electing to stand on his pleading, suffered judgment of dismissal. Omitting formal opening and closing, the amended complaint reads: