Oliver Charles Williams v. State Indiana

Appellant first argues that there was insufficient evidence of malice and premeditation. Upon such allegations we must construe the evidence most favorably to the State and see if there is substantial evidence of probative value from which a reasonable jury could infer these elements beyond a reasonable doubt. Whitfield v. State, (1977) 266 Ind. 629, 366 N.E.2d 173; James v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 384, 354 N.E.2d 236; Horton v. State, (1976) 265 Ind. 393, 354 N.E.2d 242.