O'Reilly v. O'Reilly O'Reilly v. O'Reilly

O'Reilly v. O'Reilly

MA.57 , 199 N.E. 741, 332 (1936)(293 Mass)

    • 0,99 €
    • 0,99 €

Publisher Description

RUGG, Chief Justice. It is alleged in this petition for separate support that the respondent failed without just cause to furnish suitable support for the petitioner, that he has deserted her, and that she is living apart from him for justifiable cause, with specifications that he has been guilty of cruel and abusive treatment toward her. The evidence is reported in full. A decree was entered to the effect (1) that the petitioner was actually living apart from her husband; (2) that the other allegations of the petition were not sustained; (3) that the custody of a minor child of the petitioner and the respondent be awarded to her; and (4) that the respondent pay the petitioner stated sums for the support of that child. The trial Judge, at the request of the petitioner, made a report of the material facts found by him. These findings were categorical that the respondent has not failed to furnish suitable support for the petitioner, that he has not deserted her, and that his conduct was not such as to justify the petitioner in leaving him. He further found that the description given by the petitioner of the conduct of the respondent was exaggerated, that the respondent never struck or threatened to strike her, that her health was not affected, that their quarrels were mutual, that she was unreasonable in her demands for money, and that the cause of the final separation was the act of the respondent in cutting down the allowance of the petitioner from seven hundred fifty to five hundred dollars per month. The only witnesses were the petitioner and her elder daughter. The petitioner appealed. After the hearings were closed the petitioner filed a motion supported by affidavit to introduce additional evidence. The denial of this motion in the circumstances disclosed rested in the discretion of the trial Judge and was not erroneous in law. Troeder v. Hyams, 153 Mass. 536, 541, 27 N.E. 775; Wells v. Wells, 209 Mass. 282, 291, 95 N.E. 845, 35 L.R.A.(N.S.) 561; Walsh v. Cornwell, 272 Mass. 555, 561, 172 N.E. 855.

GENRE
Professional & Technical
RELEASED
1936
30 January
LANGUAGE
EN
English
LENGTH
2
Pages
PUBLISHER
LawApp Publishers
SIZE
59.3
KB

More Books by Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Tufts v. Waltham Auto Bus Co. Et Al. Tufts v. Waltham Auto Bus Co. Et Al.
1930
Fitzgerald v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co. Fitzgerald v. Boston Elevated Ry. Co.
1931
Sparrow Chisholm Co. v. City Boston Sparrow Chisholm Co. v. City Boston
1951
Roberts v. Eastland Food Products Co. Roberts v. Eastland Food Products Co.
1948
Commonwealth v. Rivers Commonwealth v. Rivers
1948
Sherrer v. Sherrer Sherrer v. Sherrer
1946